ABSTRACT
To date, COVID-19 remains a serious global public health problem. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been adopted by many countries as an effective coping strategy. The strength of the body's immune response in the face of viral infection correlates with the number of vaccinations and the duration of vaccination. In this study, we aimed to identify specific genes that may trigger and control the immune response to COVID-19 under different vaccination scenarios. A machine learning-based approach was designed to analyze the blood transcriptomes of 161 individuals who were classified into six groups according to the dose and timing of inoculations, including I-D0, I-D2-4, I-D7 (day 0, days 2-4, and day 7 after the first dose of ChAdOx1, respectively) and II-D0, II-D1-4, II-D7-10 (day 0, days 1-4, and days 7-10 after the second dose of BNT162b2, respectively). Each sample was represented by the expression levels of 26,364 genes. The first dose was ChAdOx1, whereas the second dose was mainly BNT162b2 (Only four individuals received a second dose of ChAdOx1). The groups were deemed as labels and genes were considered as features. Several machine learning algorithms were employed to analyze such classification problem. In detail, five feature ranking algorithms (Lasso, LightGBM, MCFS, mRMR, and PFI) were first applied to evaluate the importance of each gene feature, resulting in five feature lists. Then, the lists were put into incremental feature selection method with four classification algorithms to extract essential genes, classification rules and build optimal classifiers. The essential genes, namely, NRF2, RPRD1B, NEU3, SMC5, and TPX2, have been previously associated with immune response. This study also summarized expression rules that describe different vaccination scenarios to help determine the molecular mechanism of vaccine-induced antiviral immunity.
ABSTRACT
Notably, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a tight relationship with the immune system. Human resistance to COVID-19 infection comprises two stages. The first stage is immune defense, while the second stage is extensive inflammation. This process is further divided into innate and adaptive immunity during the immune defense phase. These two stages involve various immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, dendritic cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. Various immune cells are involved and make up the complex and unique immune system response to COVID-19, providing characteristics that set it apart from other respiratory infectious diseases. In the present study, we identified cell markers for differentiating COVID-19 from common inflammatory responses, non-COVID-19 severe respiratory diseases, and healthy populations based on single-cell profiling of the gene expression of six immune cell types by using Boruta and mRMR feature selection methods. Some features such as IFI44L in B cells, S100A8 in monocytes, and NCR2 in natural killer cells are involved in the innate immune response of COVID-19. Other features such as ZFP36L2 in CD4+ T cells can regulate the inflammatory process of COVID-19. Subsequently, the IFS method was used to determine the best feature subsets and classifiers in the six immune cell types for two classification algorithms. Furthermore, we established the quantitative rules used to distinguish the disease status. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for a more in-depth investigation of COVID-19 pathogenesis and intervention strategies.
ABSTRACT
Notably, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a tight relationship with the immune system. Human resistance to COVID-19 infection comprises two stages. The first stage is immune defense, while the second stage is extensive inflammation. This process is further divided into innate and adaptive immunity during the immune defense phase. These two stages involve various immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, dendritic cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. Various immune cells are involved and make up the complex and unique immune system response to COVID-19, providing characteristics that set it apart from other respiratory infectious diseases. In the present study, we identified cell markers for differentiating COVID-19 from common inflammatory responses, non-COVID-19 severe respiratory diseases, and healthy populations based on single-cell profiling of the gene expression of six immune cell types by using Boruta and mRMR feature selection methods. Some features such as IFI44L in B cells, S100A8 in monocytes, and NCR2 in natural killer cells are involved in the innate immune response of COVID-19. Other features such as ZFP36L2 in CD4+ T cells can regulate the inflammatory process of COVID-19. Subsequently, the IFS method was used to determine the best feature subsets and classifiers in the six immune cell types for two classification algorithms. Furthermore, we established the quantitative rules used to distinguish the disease status. The results of this study can provide theoretical support for a more in-depth investigation of COVID-19 pathogenesis and intervention strategies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 displays an increased mortality rate and higher risk of severe symptoms with increasing age, which is thought to be a result of the compromised immunity of elderly patients. However, the underlying mechanisms of aging-associated immunodeficiency against Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains unclear. Epigenetic modifications show considerable changes with age, causing altered gene regulations and cell functions during the aging process. The DNA methylation patterns among patients with coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) who had different ages were compared to explore the effect of aging-associated methylation modifications in SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 were divided into three groups according to age. Boruta was used on the DNA methylation profiles of the patients to remove irrelevant features and retain essential signature sites to identify substantial aging-associated DNA methylation changes in COVID-19. Next, these features were ranked using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method, and the feature list generated by mRMR was processed into the incremental feature selection method with decision tree (DT), random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine to obtain the key methylation sites, optimal classifier, and decision rules. RESULTS: Several key methylation sites that showed distinct patterns among the patients with COVID-19 who had different ages were identified, and these methylation modifications may play crucial roles in regulating immune cell functions. An optimal classifier was built based on selected methylation signatures, which can be useful to predict the aging-associated disease risk of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Existing works and our predictions suggest that the methylation modifications of genes, such as NHLH2, ZEB2, NWD1, ELOVL2, FGGY, and FHL2, are closely associated with age in patients with COVID-19, and the 39 decision rules extracted with the optimal DT classifier provides quantitative context to the methylation modifications in elderly patients with COVID-19. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the epigenetic regulations of aging-associated COVID-19 symptoms and provide the potential methylation targets for intervention strategies in elderly patients.